Radiation-Induced Myonecrosis: A Case Report of a Cervical Cancer Patient With a History of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Radiation-induced myonecrosis is a rare but serious complication of radiation therapy. We present a case of a 49-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus who developed radiation-induced myonecrosis after concurrent chemoradiation for cervical cancer. She underwent external-beam radiation therapy, weekly cisplatin chemotherapy (40 mg/m2), and intracavitary brachytherapy. One month later, she received one cycle of nedaplatin (80 mg/m2) and irinotecan (60 mg/m2). Two months after treatment, she experienced pain in the left inguinal region. An MRI revealed a mass in the left obturator externus muscle and right pectineus muscle suggestive of myonecrosis. A biopsy confirmed the diagnosis. She received hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and her symptoms improved. The masses resolved completely.

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 8502 "QUAD shot" regimen using volumetric modulated arc therapy for incurable head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 8502 "QUAD shot" regimen using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for incurable head and neck cancer (HNC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 105 patients with HNC in the study, undergoing at least one QUAD shot regimen cycle. We planned the radiotherapy using VMAT with 6 MV photons. One QUAD shot cycle included 14.8 Gy in 4 fractions with at least 6-hour intervals over 2 consecutive days, repeated every 3-6 weeks up to 3 cycles. RESULTS: We completed 1, 2, and 3 cycles in 11 (10 %), 17 (16 %), and 77 (73 %) patients, respectively. We concurrently performed systemic therapy in 13 (12 %) patients. Tumor response was observed in 92 (88 %) patients and at least one symptom relief in 51 (71 %) of 72 patients. We observed an overall response (tumor response or symptom relief) in 98 (93 %) patients with all patients who completed 3 cycles achieving it. The median overall survival (OS) was 6.8 months. Our multivariate analysis revealed that non-squamous cell carcinoma (p < 0.001), T category of 0-2 (p = 0.021), and 3 QUAD shot cycles (p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of better OS. We observed Grade 3 toxicity in 2 (2 %) patients while no ≥ Grade 4 acute or ≥ Grade 3 late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The QUAD shot regimen using VMAT exerts appropriate palliative effect in patients with incurable HNC. Treatment with higher QUAD shot cycle number would be recommended for better treatment outcomes.

Factors associated with quality of life in patients receiving palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: a secondary cross-sectional analysis of data from a prospective multicenter observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors significantly associated with quality of life (QOL) and determine if these associations are strong enough to predict certain aspects of QOL without measuring them. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory secondary analysis of baseline data of 224 patients (enrolled between December 2020 and March 2021) from a previously published prospective observational study on radiotherapy for bone metastases at 26 centres. Using univariable linear regression, we assessed the association between patient/treatment factors and QOL scale scores as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaire Core 15-Palliative (QLQ-C15-PAL) and the EORTC QOL Questionnaire Bone Metastases module (QLQ-BM22). RESULTS: Age and sex were not significantly associated with QOL. Worse performance status, higher pain scores, and opioid and single-fraction use were significantly associated with most QOL scales; these four factors were associated with worse global QOL, worse functioning status, and more severe symptoms. The coefficients of determination for most QOL scales were less than 0.2, indicating that most of the variability in QOL scores was not explained by any of the explanatory variables. CONCLUSION: Performance status, pain intensity, and opioid and single-fraction use were significantly associated with most QOL scales. However, the associations were not strong enough to estimate QOL. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: To date, the association between treatment factors and QOL in patients with bone metastases has not been fully studied. We identified the factors that were significantly associated with QOL and found that these associations were not strong enough to predict QOL.

Prevalence and risk factors for retropharyngeal and retro-styloid lymph node metastasis in hypopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the prevalence and identified the risk factors for retropharyngeal and retro-styloid lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with hypopharyngeal carcinoma (HPC). This was achieved using a combination of magnetic resonance (MR) and [18 F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) images. METHODS: Two board-certified radiation oncologists retrospectively reviewed pretreatment FDG-PET/CT images and contrast-enhanced thin-slice CT and MR images of 155 patients with HPC who underwent radiotherapy. Fisher's exact tests and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the risk factors for LNM. RESULTS: Retropharyngeal LNM (RPLNM) was confirmed in 20 (13%) patients. Posterior wall (PW) tumors (odds ratio [OR]: 4.128, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.339-12.727; p = 0.014) and bilateral or contralateral cervical LNM (OR: 11.577, 95% CI: 2.135-62.789; p = 0.005) were significantly correlated with RPLNM. The RPLNM was found in 9 (32%) of the 28 patients with PW tumors. Of these 9 patients, 2 (7%) had ipsilateral RPLNM, 3 (11%) had contralateral RPLNM, and 4 (14%) had bilateral RPLNM. The PW tumors were significantly associated with contralateral RPLNM (p < 0.001). Retro-styloid LNM (RSLNM) was confirmed in two (1%) patients, both of whom had ipsilateral RSLNM with lymph nodes (LNs) of ≥ 15 mm in the upper limit of ipsilateral level II. A significant association was found between LNs of ≥ 15 mm in the upper limit of ipsilateral level II and ipsilateral RSLNM (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The RPLNM was identified in 13% of patients with HPC. The PW tumors and bilateral or contralateral cervical LNM were risk factors for RPLNM; particularly, PW tumors were a specific risk factor for contralateral RPLNM. Although the RSLNM was rare, LNs of ≥ 15 mm in the upper limit of ipsilateral level II were a risk factor for ipsilateral RSLNM.

Who should receive single-fraction palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer bleeding?: An exploratory analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study (JROSG 17-3).

Purpose: Although the Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) has been used to predict survival in various cancers, to our knowledge, no study has examined its applicability in gastric cancer. This study aimed to determine the baseline PPI cutoff value for recommending single-fraction radiotherapy in patients with bleeding gastric cancer. Materials and methods: This was a secondary analysis of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group (JROSG) 17-3, a multicenter prospective study of palliative radiotherapy for bleeding gastric cancer. Discrimination was evaluated using a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, and the optimal cutoff value was determined using the Youden index. A calibration plot was used to assess the agreement between predicted and observed survival. Results: We enrolled 55 patients in JROSG 17-3. The respective median survival times were 6.7, 2.8, and 1.0 months (p = 0.021) for patients with baseline PPI scores of ≤ 2, 2 < PPI ≤ 4, and PPI > 4. The areas under the curve for predicting death within 2, 3, 4, and 5 months were 0.813, 0.787, 0.775, and 0.721, respectively. The negative predictive value was highest when survival < 2 months was predicted and the Youden index was highest when the cutoff PPI value was 2. The calibration curve showed a reasonable agreement between the predicted and observed survival. Conclusion: Baseline PPI is useful for estimating short-term prognosis in patients treated with palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer bleeding. A cutoff PPI value of 2 for estimating survival ≤ 2 months should be used to recommend single-fraction radiotherapy.

Income and Employment of Patients at the Start of and During Follow-up After Palliative Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastasis.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to understand the income and employment status of patients at the start of and during follow-up after palliative radiation therapy for bone metastasis. Methods and Materials: From December 2020 to March 2021, a prospective multi-institutional observational study was conducted to investigate income and employment of patients at the start of administration of radiation therapy for bone metastasis and at 2 and 6 months after treatment. Of 333 patients referred to radiation therapy for bone metastasis, 101 were not registered, mainly because of their poor general condition, and another 8 were excluded from the follow-up analysis owing to ineligibility. Results: In 224 patients analyzed, 108 had retired for reasons unrelated to cancer, 43 had retired for reasons related to cancer, 31 were taking leave, and 2 had lost their jobs at the time of registration. The number of patients who were in the working group was 40 (30 with no change in income and 10 with decreased income) at registration, 35 at 2 months, and 24 at 6 months. Younger patients (P = 0), patients with better performance status (P = 0), patients who were ambulatory (P = .008), and patients with lower scores on a numerical rating scale of pain (P = 0) were significantly more likely to be in the working group at registration. There were 9 patients who experienced improvements in their working status or income at least once in the follow-up after radiation therapy. Conclusions: The majority of patients with bone metastasis were not working at the start of or after radiation therapy, but the number of patients who were working was not negligible. Radiation oncologists should be aware of the working status of patients and provide appropriate support for each patient. The benefit of radiation therapy to support patients continuing their work and returning to work should be investigated further in prospective studies.

[Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases].

Appropriate use of radiotherapy leads to a better patient care. Oncologists may wonder when to apply radiotherapy for painful bone metastases, what patients should particularly be offered radiotherapy, when to apply re-irradiation, when to apply radiotherapy to malignant spinal cord compression, or whether to apply radiotherapy to prevent symptoms. This paper aims to offer non-radiation oncologist physicians knowledge to help them better refer patients to radiation oncology.

Pain Response Rates After Conventional Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases Assessed Using International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Initial Radiation Therapy and Reirradiation.

Previous meta-analysis of conventional radiation therapy for painful bone metastases showed overall response (OR) rates of 72% to 75% (evaluable patients), 61% to 62% (intent-to-treat patients) for initial radiation therapy, and 68% for reirradiation (evaluable patients). However, the definition of pain response differed among the studies included. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pain response rates assessed by the International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints (ICPRE) for both initial radiation therapy and reirradiation. The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for articles published between 2002 and 2021. The inclusion criteria were (1) prospective studies or studies based on prospectively collected data and (2) studies in which pain response was assessed using ICPRE. Our primary outcomes of interest were the OR rates (sum of the complete and partial response rates) for both initial radiation therapy and reirradiation. Of the 6470 articles identified in our database search, 32 and 3 met the inclusion criteria for the analysis of initial radiation therapy and reirradiation, respectively. The OR rates of initial radiation therapy in evaluable patients (n = 4775) and intent-to-treat patients (n = 6775) were 60.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.2-65.4) and 45.4% (95% CI, 38.7-52.4), respectively. The OR rates of reirradiation in evaluable patients (n = 733) and intent-to-treat patients (n = 1085) were 70.8% (95% CI, 15.7-96.9) and 62.2% (95% CI, 5.3-98.0), respectively. Subgroup analyses of initial radiation therapy including the comparison of randomized and nonrandomized studies showed no significant differences in any comparison, indicating similar response rates across different study designs. For initial radiation therapy, we determined the ICPRE-assessed response rates, which were lower than previously reported. The OR and complete response rates should be benchmarks for future randomized and nonrandomized studies. For reirradiation, the wide CIs demonstrate that the response rates based on ICPRE require further investigation.

Impact of interstitial lung abnormality on survival after adjuvant durvalumab with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been the standard of care for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The results of the PACIFIC trial established the use of consolidative durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) as the standard of care for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). A subgroup analysis of the PACIFIC trial reported a better progression-free survival (PFS) in Asians. Although real-world data on LA-NSCLC patients who received CCRT plus durvalumab have been reported, there have been few large-scale reports on Asians. In this study, we investigated prognostic factors in the largest real-world data set in Asia of only Japanese LA-NSCLC patients treated with CCRT plus durvalumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirteen LA-NSCLC patients who received definitive CCRT and consolidative durvalumab at our institution between May 2018 and April 2021 were analyzed. Overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), PFS, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and in-field progression-free survival (IFPFS) were investigated as treatment outcomes using competing risk analyses. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 5-47) after the initiation of durvalumab therapy, 31 patients died, of whom 23 died of lung cancer. In the multivariate analysis, the pretreatment factors that correlated with OS were ILA scores, adenocarcinoma, and performance status at the initiation of durvalumab. Furthermore, ILA score and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 1 % were significantly correlated with CSS, and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 1 % was significantly correlated with PFS and IFPFS. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment ILA, adenocarcinoma, and performance status may have an impact on OS of LA-NSCLC patients receiving CCRT plus durvalumab.

Bias due to statistical handling of death and reirradiation in the assessment of duration of response after palliative radiotherapy: a scoping review and analysis of clinical data.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the influence of handling death and reirradiation on the estimation of duration of response (DOR). METHODS: First, we performed a scoping review on methods to assess DOR in palliative radiotherapy. Second, we performed three different analyses on a subgroup of patients from a previously published prospective study. The first analysis was a competing risks analysis considering relapse of pain as the event of interest and death and reirradiation as competing events (Analysis A). The second and third analyses were standard survival analyses where the event of interest was a composite outcome of relapse of pain, death, or reirradiation (Analysis B) and relapse of pain (Analysis C), respectively. RESULTS: Death was considered as an event of interest in less than half of the papers, while reirradiation was not considered in any of the studies. Competing risks analysis was not performed in any of the studies. In the analysis of clinical data, competing risks analysis showed that relapse of pain predominated as the cause of the end of response. Median DOR was correctly estimated to be 4.1 months in Analyses A and B, but was overestimated to be 8.1 months in Analysis C. CONCLUSIONS: Death and reirradiation should be treated as the events of interest that mark the end of response (as in Analyses A and B) to avoid overestimation of treatment efficacy and an invalid assumption of independent censoring. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The definition of end of response remains inconclusive in the assessment of DOR. We recommend competing risks analysis (Analysis A), by which we can estimate cumulative incidence of each event type and evaluate the necessity of reirradiation.

Incidence of and risk factors for non-hematologic toxicity with combined radiotherapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer using dose-volume parameters analysis: a multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data on combined radiotherapy (RT) and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) risk factors and toxicity. This study aimed to assess the incidence of and risk factors for non-hematologic toxicities in patients treated with combined RT and CDK4/6i using dose-volume parameter analysis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving RT within 14 days of CDK4/6i use. The endpoint was non-hematologic toxicities. Patient characteristics and RT treatment planning data were compared between the moderate or higher toxicities (≥ grade 2) group and the non-moderate toxicities group. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included in the study. CDK4/6i was provided at a median daily dose of 125 mg and 200 mg for palbociclib and abemaciclib, respectively. In patients who received concurrent RT and CDK4/6i (N = 29), the median concurrent prescribed duration of CDK4/6i was 14 days. The median delivered RT dose was 30 Gy and 10 fractions. The rate of grade 2 and 3 non-hematologic toxicities was 30% and 2%, respectively. There was no difference in toxicity between concurrent and sequential use of CDK4/6i. The moderate pneumonitis group had a larger lung V20 equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction and planning target volume than the non-moderate pneumonitis group. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate toxicities are frequent with combined RT and CDK4/6i. Caution is necessary concerning the combined RT and CDK4/6i. Particularly, reducing the dose to normal organs is necessary for combined RT and CDK4/6i.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for painful bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a promising approach in treating painful bone metastases. However, the superiority of SBRT over conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) remains controversial. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was conducted to compare SBRT and cEBRT for the treatment of bone metastases. METHODS: A search was conducted using PubMed on January 22, 2022, with the following inclusion criteria: (i) randomised controlled trials comparing SBRT with cEBRT for bone metastases and (ii) endpoint including pain response. Effect sizes across studies were pooled using random-effects models in a meta-analysis of risk ratios. RESULTS: A total of 1246 articles were screened, with 7 articles comprising 964 patients (522 and 442 patients in the SBRT and cEBRT arms, respectively) meeting the inclusion criteria. The overall pain response (OR) rates of bone metastases at 3 months were 45% and 36% in the SBRT and cEBRT arms, respectively. The present analyses showed no significant difference between the two groups. In four studies included for the calculation of OR rates of spinal metastases at three months, the OR rates were 40% and 35% in the SBRT and cEBRT arms, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups. The incidence of severe adverse effects and health-related quality of life outcomes were comparable between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: The superiority of SBRT over cEBRT for pain palliation in bone metastases was not confirmed in this meta-analysis. Although SBRT is a standard of care for bone metastases, patients receiving SBRT should be selected appropriately.

Statistical handling of death events in the analysis of time to progression: A review of oncology journals.

BACKGROUND: Time to progression (TTP) is the length of time from the date of diagnosis or the start of treatment to disease progression. In the analysis of TTP, standard survival analysis, where death events are censored, may be problematic and competing risks analysis should be used instead. We investigated statistical methods used in the analysis of TTP. METHODS: We performed a literature search in six oncology journals for original articles published between 2016 and 2020. We only included articles where TTP was analyzed. After excluding articles in which the events of interest included death or in which the definition of TTP was not specified, we sought to learn whether TTP was analyzed by standard survival analysis or competing risks analysis. RESULTS: Of the 143 articles in which TTP was evaluated, 65 that defined the event of interest as only progression were included in the study. Of the 65 articles analyzed, 43 (66%) were on solid tumors and 22 (34%) were on hematologic tumors. In 59 (91%) of the 65 articles, standard survival analysis was performed. CONCLUSION: The event of interest was mostly defined as progression without inclusion of any death event. In most recent articles on oncology, TTP seems to be analyzed by standard survival analysis. There is much room for improvement in the statistical methods in the analysis of TTP in oncology research.

Quality Indicators in Palliative Radiation Oncology: Development and Pilot Testing.

PURPOSE: A quality indicator (QI) is a valuable tool to evaluate the quality of health care systems. In palliative radiation oncology, only a few related QIs have been developed to date. In this study, we sought to develop and pilot test QIs that assess the quality of care in palliative radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus with an expert panel. The panel consisted of 8 radiation oncologists who have expertise in palliative radiation oncology and 1 expert on Delphi methodology. Online panel meetings and e-mail surveys were conducted to develop QIs on palliative radiation therapy for bone and brain metastases. Feasibility of measurement was assessed though pilot surveys that were conducted by radiation oncologists at 5 facilities. RESULTS: After 3 online meetings and 2 e-mail surveys, we developed 4 QIs on bone metastases and 3 QIs on brain metastases. Two email surveys and 2 pilot surveys confirmed the validity of QIs and the feasibility of measurement, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed valid and feasible QIs on palliative radiation therapy for bone and brain metastases. Our work may contribute to reduce the evidence-practice gaps in palliative radiation oncology.

Prevalence and risk factors of retro-styloid lymph node metastasis in oropharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Supporting data defining the selection criteria of level VIIb for inclusion in the target volume in radiotherapy (RT) planning are insufficient. We evaluated the prevalence of level VIIb retro-styloid lymph node metastasis (RSLNM) and associated risk factors in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed pre-treatment [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) along with contrast-enhanced thin slice CT and magnetic resonance (MR) images of 137 patients pathologically confirmed as having OPC who underwent RT. The location of lymph nodes (LNs) was confirmed on the planning CT images. Fisher's exact test and logistic regression analyses were made to determine the risk factors of RSLNM. RESULTS: RSLNM was confirmed in 18 (13%) patients. All RSLNMs were located within level VIIb on the planning CT images. No patients exhibited LNM in contralateral level VIIb. Furthermore, no patients with negative or single ipsilateral cervical LNM had RSLNM. Fisher's exact test revealed that smoking status (p=.027), multiple ipsilateral cervical LNM (p=.045) and LN ≥15 mm in the upper limit of ipsilateral level II (p<.001) were significantly associated with RSLNM. Logistic regression analyses revealed that the presence of LNs ≥15 mm in upper limit of ipsilateral level II was significantly associated with RSLNM (odds ratio: 977.297; 95% confidence interval: 57.629-16573.308; p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: RSLNM is relatively common in patients with OPC with a prevalence rate of approximately 10%. The prevalence of RSLNM in patients with negative or single ipsilateral cervical LNM and contralateral RSLNM is extremely low; therefore, level VIIb can be excluded from the target volume in such patients. LN ≥15 mm in the upper limit of ipsilateral level II is a risk factor for RSLNM. Ipsilateral level VIIb should be included in the target volume for patients with this risk factor.KEY MESSAGERetro-styloid lymph node metastasis (RSLNM) prevalence is ∼10% in oropharyngeal carcinoma.Lymph node ≥15 mm in ipsilateral level II upper limit is a risk factor for RSLNM.

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil for T3 N0 Glottic Carcinoma Without Vocal Cord Fixation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) for T3 N0 glottic carcinoma without vocal cord fixation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients underwent TPF-CCRT without elective nodal irradiaion (ENI). After the RT of 40 Gy, five patients (20%) without tumor regression underwent surgery. Others underwent RT with a median total dose of 66 Gy. RESULTS: Of the five patients who underwent surgery after the RT of 40 Gy, two showed residual carcinoma pathologically and the other three were confirmed to have complete pathological response to the treatment. The 5-year local control rate was 87%. No patients exhibited regional failure. No acute toxicities of grade 5 or late toxicities ≥grade 3 were observed. CONCLUSION: TPF-CCRT provides excellent tumor control with acceptable toxicities. CCRT while omitting ENI is a reasonable approach for T3 N0 glottic carcinoma without vocal cord fixation.

Treatment response after palliative radiotherapy for bleeding gastric cancer: a multicenter prospective observational study (JROSG 17-3).

BACKGROUND: Palliative radiotherapy seems to be rarely performed for incurable gastric cancer. In this first multicenter study, we examined the effectiveness of palliative radiotherapy and investigated whether biologically effective dose (BED) is associated with survival, response, or re-bleeding. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included blood transfusion or hemoglobin levels < 8.0 g/dL. The primary endpoint was the intention-to-treat (ITT) bleeding response rate at 4 weeks. Response entailed all of the following criteria: (i) hemoglobin levels ≥ 8.0 g/dL; (ii) 7 consecutive days without blood transfusion anytime between enrollment and blood sampling; and (iii) no salvage treatment (surgery, endoscopic treatment, transcatheter embolization, or re-irradiation) for bleeding gastric cancer. Re-bleeding was defined as the need for blood transfusion or salvage treatment. RESULTS: We enrolled 55 patients from 15 institutions. The ITT response rates were 47%, 53%, and 49% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively. The per-protocol response rates were 56%, 78%, and 90% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively. Neither response nor BED (α/ß = 10) predicted overall survival. Multivariable Fine-Gray model showed that BED was not a significant predictor of response. Univariable Cox model showed that BED was not significantly associated with re-bleeding. Grades 1, 2, 3, and, ≥ 4 radiation-related adverse events were reported in 11, 9, 1, and 0 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The per-protocol response rate increased to 90% during the 8-week follow-up. The frequent occurrence of death starting shortly after enrollment lowered the ITT response rate. BED was not associated with survival, bleeding response, or re-bleeding.